PETER ROST: PHARMA MARKETING EXPERT WITNESS. AWP, MEDICAL DEVICE EXPERT.: Dooce blogger Heather Armstrong Settles Lawsuit with Kensington Publishing Group
screen2largeMM

Dr. Rost provides services as a pharmaceutical marketing expert witness. For more info see: Drug Expert Witness. Dr. Peter Rost email. Copyright © 2006-2013 InSync Communication. All rights reserved. Terms of use agreement, privacy policy and the computer fraud and abuse act.
.

PETER ROST: PHARMA MARKETING EXPERT WITNESS. AWP, MEDICAL DEVICE EXPERT.

Peter Rost, M.D., is a former Pfizer Marketing Vice President providing services as a medical device and drug expert witness and pharmaceutical marketing expert. Judge Sanders: "The court agrees with defendants' view that Dr. Rost is a very adept and seasoned expert witness." He is also the author of Emergency Surgery, The Whistleblower and Killer Drug. You can reach him on rostpeter (insert symbol) hotmail.com. Please read the terms of use agreement and privacy policy for this blog carefully.

Dooce blogger Heather Armstrong Settles Lawsuit with Kensington Publishing Group

I know, I know. My regular readers must wonder why I'm all of a sudden so interested in the fate of Dooce blogger Heather Armstrong. And why I'm interrupting my interesting series of posts featuring stilettos to talk about boring legal stuff.

But this is anything but a boring story; it is a rather sad tale with an unexpected twist.

And the fact is that since I wrote about the Dooce story yesterday, my blog has been completely innundated with Dooce readers who want to find out what Heather didn't write on her own blog; that is, why she was sued and why she had to settle.

I'm not jealous of her legal predicaments, but I am a little bit jealous about all her readers. Wow! This was like a Tsunami coming by.

So, I guess, since I've managed to find out the story I should tell all the Dooce readers what Heather didn't disclose in her own blog.

A few years back, Heather B. Armstrong got fired because of her blog, which, of course, helped her blog soare to the stratosphere and everyone started reading it. Same story as when Pfizer went to Court to ask for sanction because I had written "The Whistleblower."

Anyway, Heather's big audience made her a great candidate for one of those blogger book deals I have written about (most recently Petite Anglaise), and back in November 2005, according to the lawsuit, Heather agreed orally to a two book deal with Kensington's Rebel Base Books line. I guess that simply means she agreed to start negotiating, which, of course, is not how this is portrayed in the complaint.

They negotiated for months, until they had a final agreement in May 2006. The complaint alleges everyone was happy and they has sorted everything out. But Heather didn't want to sign that final agreement.

I guess she thought, like anyone would, that as long as she didn't sign the dotted line, she was fine, and could back out. Of course, the publisher claims they had started doing a lot of work and pre-marketing, and so, lost money.

In fact, they write, "As a result of the breach of contract by Armstrong, Kensington will suffer irreparable harm."

And here comes the kicker . . . what made Kensington so mad? They contend that Heather went to a different publisher with her book.

Heather has announced a settlement on Dooce, "officially ending what has been the most traumatic, agonizing, demoralizing experience of my life."

In case you wonder about the outcome, she adds: "I have no faith in our legal system, one that guarantees victory only for the party who can afford to pay for it, one that would allow a large company to bully a private citizen because it knows that she has no money with which to defend herself. I am angry and bitter and feeling all sorts of unbecoming emotions. More than that, though, I am afraid that these people are watching everything I say here, ready to pounce on a single word, twist it, manipulate it, and then sue me again."

And in this lies a good lesson. An oral contract is a valid contract, and the fact that someone backs out before signing the dotted line can be expensive, indeed. Which makes any negotiation pretty dangerous. I hope Petite Anglaise doesn't make the same mistake.

Here are the comments by a third party lawyer on this case: "Oral negotiations between two parties in order to come to an agreement on specific terms of a contract occur. The representative of one of the parties assures the representative of the other that the contract is fine, it meets all expectations, and it will be signed. All of this is memorialized in writing.

Then, the rep of one of the parties informs the other party that they intend to breach the contract for which they have negotiated. Money has been spent in anticipation of this contract (also known as detrimental reliance). The person breaching the oral contract cannot provide any reasonable explanation for the breach other than: 1) the editor left; and 2) they did not receive enough “support” from the company and it was “nerve-wracking.”


This lawyer claims this is all cause for action.

But the flip side is also that it is rather shocking to see a rich publisher going after an author this way . . . and who knows who was right?

After all, the publisher had a few more lawyers than Heather, a ton more money, and in the end the one with the biggest pockets is likely to win any legal fight in the U.S.

If you want to view the entire complaint, click trainwrecks.net.

9 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

The comments left on 'trainwrecks' (gotta love the inference) regarding the Dooced legal snafu, aren't to be missed - http://www.trainwrecks.net/?p=294#comments

10/17/2006  
Blogger Free to Be said...

I tried yesterday to find an Answer to the Complaint, but was unsuccessful. I assume there was one before the settlement?

10/19/2006  
Blogger Doogman said...

So she's going to go talk to them about a book deal now?

I hope the publisher realizes how much bad blood they've created and does her a great deal.

I'll buy anything she writes, she always makes me laugh - and that's a gift.

12/14/2006  
Anonymous Renee said...

I, too, would like to know the outcome of the settlement. The Plaintiff is asking that she be permanently bound to them. I think that's outrageous. She should write the two books for them, and then be left alone from those assholes. Does anyone know the outcome of the settlement?

As far as buying her books. Even though she's funny and I like her blog, as a matter of principle I will NOT buy any of her books published by that company.

12/14/2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sadly, you cited a very awful blog "Trainwrecks," who uses other people's misery to create their content and then stand idly by and laugh while that "trainwrecked" blogger gets kicked some more. The women behind trainwrecks.net, and many like myself are more than aware of their true identities, are women whose life lacks any character at all.

You have a very informative and intelligent blog, it's just disappointing that you would use trainwrecks as your source.

12/18/2006  
Anonymous Scared of the Trainwreck people said...

I have to second the words of anon above, Trainwrecks is a hate site that has in the past made thinly-veiled threats against children, called grieving mothers of suicidal children 'delusional', and led an attack against one poor woman who ultimately ended up committing suicide in part due to their attacks on her. Seeing you use them as a reference point for anything whatsoever is a true discredit to an otherwise respectable blog.

12/31/2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Okay, that's funny. I've been reading Trainwrecks from the beginning, and they certainly never threatened any children, and the "suicide" was an obvious hoax by a reader who admitted the hoax about twelve hours later. See here:

http://www.trainwrecks.net/?p=367

12/31/2006  
Anonymous A Fan said...

THE Dr. Rost! I loved your book and was referred here via a link and would also implore you to investigate the trainwrecks.net. people. They have caused many bloggers to either go password protected or stop blogging completely. They are pulling back a bit at the moment because a blog is revealing their true identities www.heavennose.blogspot.com - it looks like they left their sitemeter open to the public and the trainwreckers were caught red handed. Very surprisingly, the trainwreck authors are a group of four women - a defense attorney, a USC professor, a broker and an Epidemiologist who works at a Cancer Research Center which may explain their fascination with blogs where women are undergoing medical treatments. There is a movement to complain to USC and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, there seems to be a lot of evidence and they have arrogantly admitted that they really don't care that people know who they are. I do think that USC and the Cancer Research Center would be alarmed at what is being traced back to their computers. They just stooped so low as to target a woman who had just lost her baby. Theirs is not a blog that targets celebrity or the infamous, their prey is the everyday Jane in middle America who is reaching out for support or with information. It is the great analogy of the bullies on the playgroud beating so many people up and finally, the masses get really sick and tired and fight back. Granted, some of what heavennose is doing is hitting below the belt but they are fighting fire with fire. I hope the bullies finally get their asses kicked. They are vicious sociopaths.

12/31/2006  
Anonymous Heaven Nose Nothing said...

Oh, good God! Those people from Heaven Nose do not have any clue what they are talking about. This is a post about Dooce, not your immature little panty brigade, Heaven Nose!

1/03/2007  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home