Dr. Rost provides services as a pharmaceutical marketing expert witness. For more info see: Drug Expert Witness. Dr. Peter Rost email. Copyright © 2006-2013 InSync Communication. All rights reserved. Terms of use agreement, privacy policy and the computer fraud and abuse act.


Peter Rost, M.D., is a former Pfizer Marketing Vice President providing services as a medical device and drug expert witness and pharmaceutical marketing expert. Judge Sanders: "The court agrees with defendants' view that Dr. Rost is a very adept and seasoned expert witness." He is also the author of Emergency Surgery, The Whistleblower and Killer Drug. You can reach him on rostpeter (insert symbol) Please read the terms of use agreement and privacy policy for this blog carefully.

My Cheating Friend - 3

Many of you have asked what happened to "my cheating friend." I haven't written more about her, because I didn't hear anything back. But finally, she did call.

Some of you also asked what my role was in her affair and how I could blog about this situation, without betraying her. You can relax; enough details have been changed.

As for my role? Actually, the whole situation took me by surprise. I wasn't quite sure how to act or react, so I started to write, figuring some of your comments might be helpful.

I don't have a role, except that I am her friend, and I'm listening. I'm not condoning what is going on, but I also know that I don't have the power to stop it.

As you may remember from my first and second blogs on this, she had an out-of-body experience with her young lover and was going to meet this man a second time at a conference; she simply couldn't or wouldn't stay away from him in spite of the fact that (or perhaps because) she'd never done something like this in the past.

And she did meet him. She had the second night of what she described as pure ectasy. I think she would have left her husband, if she thought this affair could go somewhere, but her young lover has his own family, and isn't likely to leave them.

So there she is. Or was.

Because the reason she called is that she's pregnant. You may remember she'd been married for many years and didn't have any children. But now she's pregnant and she just found out.

The implication is that it isn't likely that her husband is the father, but the new lover.

To make matters worse, after their second rendezvous at that conference, the young lover got cold feet and broke it off.

So now she is heartbroken and in complete panic about what to do. She always wanted a baby, but not this way. Her husband always wanted a baby, but certainly not this way.

She told me she'll stay with her husband and have the baby. She hasn't said a word to him about anything yet and I'm not sure she will. That leaves me knowing, and feeling very strange about the fact that I do know.

Usually I don't have a problem coming up with advice, but this time I don't have any. At least none that she would listen to.

So I did some looking around on the net. It turns out that among those who work in genetics the consensus is that roughly 10 percent of us are not fathered by the man we believe to be dad.

A British survey conducted between 1988 and 1996 by Robin Baker, a former professor at the University of Manchester, confirmed the 10-per-cent figure. That may seem high to skeptics such as Dalhousie University geneticist Paul Neumann, although even he admitted that "my colleague, who's a woman, tells me women have no trouble believing it. . . . It's the men who can't."

Another story comes from Bernard Dickens, a specialist in health law and policy at the University of Toronto. He said that the non-paternity rate was three times that. "In the early 1970s, a schoolteacher in southern England assigned a class science project in which his students were to find out the blood types of their parents. The students were then to use this information to deduce their own blood types (because a gene from each parent determines your blood type, in most instances only a certain number of combinations are possible). Instead, 30 per cent of the students discovered their dads were not their biologically fathers. " The project was discontinued on the grounds that the classroom was not the ideal place for young people to find out this information.

And in a study in the Journal of the American Medical Association in 1995, “Blood Grouping Tests in Undisputed Paternity Proceedings,” using blood typing, the result was that 18 percent of the men who had voluntarily admitted paternity, were not the actual fathers of the children.

In yet another study, the American Association of Blood Banks said the 300,000 paternity tests it conducted on men in the year 2000 ruled out nearly 30% as the father.

An anthropologist at Rutgers University, Dr. Helen Fisher, surveyed people who said they were in love. 20 percent of the men and 12 percent of the women disagreed with the statement “Being sexually faithful is important when you are in love.” The conclusion is that while monogamy is the officially approved form of mating in the United States, a significant minority of maybe 10 percent of women and 20 percent of men, disagree.

So perhaps, the situation my friend found herself in is much more common than we expect. As for me, there's no way I can do the right thing. If I talk I break her confidence.* If I don't talk I participate in her deception. The only solution--get her to talk to her husband.

And I'm not the only one who had to struggle with this situation. In 1994, the Committee on Assessing Genetic Risks of the Institute of Medicine published their recommendations regarding the ethical issues raised by advances in genetics. One of the Committee's recommendations was to inform women when test results revealed misattributed paternity, but not to disclose this information to the women's partners. The Committee's reason for withholding such information was that "genetic testing should not be used in ways that disrupt families". Others, of course, disagree and feel that non-disclosure to the male partner is unethical.

In life, sometimes there are no pretty solutions.

For those of you interested in reading more, click here.

*(And no, this blog doesn't qualify as talking, since I have disguised the details.)


Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ann Coulter may be obnoxious but she is not as crazy as she seems.
Your cheater would make a very happy widow indeed. Her cuckolded
husband's death would be the answer to her problems. He had better hire a food taster. Dear Lord, please oh please do not make Mrs. Unfaithful a liberal Democrat!

Anonymous Anonymous said...

This woman may, at one time, have been your friend, but she certainly isn't behaving like one now. She put you in a situation where you have to either betray a confidence or betray your principles. She has pulled you into her drama and set you up to be a bad guy. If you tell her husband, you "betray" her and, presuming she doesn't tell her husband, if you don't tell him, you betray yourself.

The basis of all friendships is trust and if she won't be honest with her husband, how can you ever trust her to honest with you in the context of your friendship?

You more than I know how important it is for a child to know his or her family medical hstory. If she isn't willing to be honest for the health and well-being of her child, she isn't worth having as a friend.

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Tell the husband. If, no WHEN he finds out. It will not be a good situation. He needs to know now before the child is born. If I were him I would leave the crazy.

Blogger Karen McL said...

Now this has a two-part issue.

First is the position she may have (or may not) have put you with this confidence and need to talk to someone about this predicament.

That YOU must answer to some degree of 1) keeping this a secret, 2) betraying this other friend - her spouse by keeping this secret, 3) your own moral view of this affair, 4) her use of your confidence in this way.

But ...the question I would be wondering is ...HOW in this day and age and availability of contraceptives for men and women does ANYONE get pregnant? I find that a very peculiar point in this...

..and perhaps I would think it to be less than an *accidental* occurance and that inference would change the dynamic of my viewpoint (if I were YOU- but I'm not.)

In other words...why would someone deliberately create this kind of complication and then dump this on yer tender mercies as a friend's confidence?

Well, things will sort themselves out despite your friendship and you have to decide how much of this really should or does involve YOU. Only you can say.

Blogger Two Knaves said...

He's making this up. He's crazy.

Reading his other posts you haven't gathered this as yet?


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home