PETER ROST: PHARMA MARKETING EXPERT WITNESS. AWP, MEDICAL DEVICE EXPERT.: Wikipedia Updates Huffington Post Entry to Include Recent Scandal
screen2largeMM

Dr. Rost provides services as a pharmaceutical marketing expert witness. For more info see: Drug Expert Witness. Dr. Peter Rost email. Copyright © 2006-2013 InSync Communication. All rights reserved. Terms of use agreement, privacy policy and the computer fraud and abuse act.
.

PETER ROST: PHARMA MARKETING EXPERT WITNESS. AWP, MEDICAL DEVICE EXPERT.

Peter Rost, M.D., is a former Pfizer Marketing Vice President providing services as a medical device and drug expert witness and pharmaceutical marketing expert. Judge Sanders: "The court agrees with defendants' view that Dr. Rost is a very adept and seasoned expert witness." He is also the author of Emergency Surgery, The Whistleblower and Killer Drug. You can reach him on rostpeter (insert symbol) hotmail.com. Please read the terms of use agreement and privacy policy for this blog carefully.

Wikipedia Updates Huffington Post Entry to Include Recent Scandal

The Huffington Post
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Huffington Post (often shortened to HuffPost or HuffPo) is a political group weblog founded by Arianna Huffington and Kenneth Lerer. Begun on May 9, 2005, it is notable because of its early success and prominence as a predominantly leftist news and commentary outlet, and its feature of Huffington's network of prominent friends from various fields and viewpoints. Its name is most likely a play on The Washington Post, the prominent US newspaper.

/snip/

Controversy
22 June 2006: The Guardian newspaper has reported on alleged suppression of Huffington Post blog writer Peter Rost after he found evidence of harassment by Post technology manager Andy Yaco-Mink [1]

The George Clooney HuffPo fake blog scandal is not mentioned. What gives?

:)

Wikipedia link
here.

30 Comments:

Anonymous TrollzRevil said...

I think Arianna is trying to figure out the best way to cook crow. She'll be eating it by the plate-full over this mess.

It's too bad 'cause she could've made it a great site.

6/26/2006  
Anonymous Rosethejet said...

Well I'm still holding out hope that Arianna doesn't really or truly understand what happened. She's smart but computer techs are way above her. AND I am sure she is so busy jetsetting that she WANTS to believe the partner and techs around her.

It's hard to try and realize that by making her site honest and open, she will INCREASE her traffic and thus her money, but it appears the money being offered by pfizer and other pharmas along with the cash she is generating is more important.

Just like the people she attacks.

I can only hope she sees and understands the damage she has allowed to happen to her site by refusing to get past the Money Trough she is eating from.

Otherwise she is just another Pig At The Trough Whore.

6/26/2006  
Anonymous bebop said...

I edited the controversy section to include a link to this site doc. :)

6/26/2006  
Blogger Roger Rancourt said...

Yes, just why would Arianna fire her partner who made her all that money and the expensive car?

"SPAM every whore
*For $100 I will harvest all the email addresses on the
youwhores.comwebsite and send every whore a message of your choice.

You can use this
opportunity to sell viagra, herbalife, morgages, penis enlargement pills, or
other useful products.
Jonah Peretti*
peretti@media.mit.edu
United States of America - 03/07/04"

http://www.youwhores.com/hate.html

A really great, professional guy who takes misconduct the most seriously.

Also, they control all the website content. Without them the HuffPo would blow away, no ad revenue and Fox News soundbytes.

8-O

6/26/2006  
Anonymous thebronxzoo said...

Dr. Rost,

I fixed Wikipedia for you:

Controversy

16 March 2006: George Clooney states that he didn't compose the blog post that appeared on the Huffington Post. Arianna Huffington pieced it together from quotes of his television interviews without his permission and allegedly threatened him that exposing the controversy would be bad for his career. [1]

22 June 2006: The Guardian newspaper has reported on alleged suppression of Huffington Post blog writer Peter Rost [2]after he found evidence of harassment by Post technology manager Andy Yaco-Mink [3]

6/26/2006  
Blogger antishill said...

Arianna is a celebrity not a manager. She can use this fact to escape this mess relatively unscathed by firing director of spamming and shilling Peretti and hiring an experienced journalism manager to clean things up and find Peretti's replacement. Hell, Dan Rather is available...

6/26/2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

now dr. rost has a new career - blogging about himself. not only can he embrace victimhood, but he can let others use him as a political tool. how nice.

6/26/2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Looks like we were right, and the paid Peretti trolls have now come to attack this blog & everybody.

Such a farcical scam, I say its time the light shineth down on all of it!!!

6/26/2006  
Anonymous Rosethejet said...

Yep sure looks like a huffho troll to me too.

Waaaaaaaaaaa It must really hurt knowing that as long as this is up even advertisers might start wanting more proof of veiwership vs those who have ad blockers.

I am almost willing to bet most people have ad blockers and that the advertisers MIGHT be hitting one out of a hundred viewers.

I've talked to more than a few people who said they didn't know the place had ads either.

Asvertisers might want to know this information.

6/26/2006  
Blogger antishill said...

I feel shortchanged. On HuffPost, the paid troll says "bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!"

6/26/2006  
Anonymous bebop said...

antishill,
They can't fire Peretti. He's a co-founder. It'd be like a divorce. Who gets to keep the site?

And now I'm not sure of Arianna's innocense. She's had plenty of time to be informed. I'm sure Jonah isn't the only one to have chimed in at this point. She does have intelligent kids. And Harry Sheer and Marty Kaplan's position in all this is pretty telling too. Maybe they get special treatment compared to her other bloggers. Maybe the get paid. Maybe they own shares in the company! Maybe Love owns shares in the company! Again, we're not talking about peanuts here. They were a commercial venture from day one. They had paying advertisers on opening day. I'm sure it took a minimum of hundreds of thousands to setup the site, hire the people, get office space in Manhattan and Los Angeles, and of course, take out ads to promote the site.

6/26/2006  
Anonymous bebop said...

rosethejet,
The advertisers definitely know about ad blockers. They research this shit day in day out. But 1% of 1,000,000 is still 10,000.

6/26/2006  
Anonymous thebronxzoo said...

bebop

Setting up a fairly complex web site really doesn't cost that much. I know because I've done it. A techie fresh out of college probably works really cheap.

rosethejet

I have adblocking software as do most people I know. Has anyone written to JWT yet to see if they're aware that HuffPo may be rigging their stats?

6/26/2006  
Blogger shooter said...

DR.ROST, now I'm beginning to understand the term "truthiness." You simply set up a parallel universe where lies are facts, patriotism is treason, and knowledge is subversive. Much like a lot of talk radio, Fox News, and the right wing of the Republican Party. Unfortunately it has also invaded the Blogosphere. Years ago, when many people had at least a rudimentary knowledge of history, these concepts would have seemed unthinkable. Yet today, we accept them with a yawn. You need only look at the large number of sychophantic bloggers and many of their naive posters, coming to the defense of the duplicity being perpetrated on Huffpo.
This deception, however, didn't begin with your revelation. I noticed it months and months ago. Here is a response I wrote to a reviewer of Huffpo, which was approaching her one year anniversary:

***********************

"Hello Eric, I just read your piece/review of Arianna Huffington's Blog. I only wish your praise was warranted. I am a fairly well educated, involved, approaching seniorhood, American. I have been a supporter and fan of Mz Huffington long before her Blog premiered. I appreciated her fortitude and moxey in the face of unrelenting scorn and sarcasm. When her blog appeared, I was thrilled and became a regular visitor. My admiration and respect, unfortunately, was unrequited and I will not participate in this staged, manipulated, and dishonest forum any longer. Her "mistake" re: George Clooney was merely a glimpse into the business plan she has adopted. She is (and this is important) first and foremost a "star." Her goal is stardom, not the free flow of opinions. Of all the serious blogs that I subscribe to none even approaches Huffpo in manipulation and censorship.
When I post a serious response or query, hours, often 6 to 10, go by before being posted. When two morons, flinging gutter insults at each other post, they are printed instantly. Just today a genius described Laura Bush using the "C" word. Frank Rich was a "Jewboy." No problem. Apparently a good cat fight brings in more viewers than cognitive input. They threaten you with blackballing if you complain to their screeners and they never, ever respond to the numerous e-mails I've sent requesting a clarification of their policies. You are posted because you're known and another trophy on her belt. A while ago many, many posters complained as I'm doing now. No more. Blackballed. So praise her if you will, but to me she is a fraud and I am so very, very disapointed.
Feel free to forward this to Arianna. I'm sure her shredder is heavy duty. Be forewarned, if you question her, you too will be blackballed."

***********************

As you have recently discovered, nothing much has changed. Chalk up another win for "absolute power corrupts absolutely."

p.s. To those of you who hold out the notion(hope) that Arianna "doesn't know'"
please click your heels three times and wake up.

6/26/2006  
Blogger Roger Rancourt said...

Arianna doesn't know like Bush doesn't know about the Iraq misadventure.

Plus there is possible tax fraud here....stay tuned for investigations!!!

6/26/2006  
Anonymous bebop said...

Wow. Great article. The end was funny to me:

http://www.reason.com/0507/co.mw.cashing.shtml

By the way Bronxzoo, if you read the article, you'll see this wasn't some ragtag operation with college grads running the ship. Kenneth Lerer is not cheap. When AOL hired him as a Exec VP, he made them buy out his consulting company. No financial disclosure, but I'm sure it wasn't peanuts.

6/26/2006  
Anonymous thebronxzoo said...

beebop

I should have explained myself better with what I meant before. The actual cost of putting up a website, even if you maintain your own server is nominal. I was thinking that there may have been outlay for fancy consultants and all, but I bet all the founders at HuffPo got stock options in privately traded HuffPo stock rather than cash upfront.

Only a thought, but if "follow the money" works to uncover mendacity, perhaps all the HuffPo apologists have more at stake than their "good names."

6/26/2006  
Anonymous Rosethejet said...

Well I actually do hold out hope. Like your letter said, I've been a fan for a long time and what made it the most for me was her Shadow Convention in L.A.

It was phenomonal and the press totally ignored her and the Shadow convention. But she was on the radio as well.

Her THP was a great place to go but in the last several months the trollz, both hers and I am sure GOP paid shills have made the place intolerable.

As stated the nastiness goes up immediatly and rational debate is held off sometimes NEVER to be seen again.

IF she is in L.A. where she lives and IF the site is actually being manipulated in N.Y. then I still hold out that she hasn't a clue.

BUT what makes it possibly worse is that she may not WANT to have a clue.

Just collect the checks.

I hope Vanity Fair gets into this. I've been writing them a few times and directing them here to get what is really going on and from there I am sure they can figure out the rest.

They write the best articles and most in depth. Doc have you talked to them or inquired?

They love the High and Mighty scandals and after having just done a serious article praising here to the high heavens this might be just exactly what they are looking for.

I can hope.

6/26/2006  
Anonymous bebop said...

Rose,
I guess you haven't been to LA. I live here. People like Arianna, by that I mean really rich people, go back and forth all the time. I would not be surprised if she had homes on both coasts.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/slicing-the-big-apple_b_18354.html

And come on. Distance really isn't a factor for her not knowing. We're not talking about some store she's running on Madison Ave having issues. This is her website. She can check on it from Zimbabwe. She can always take 10 minutes and read the Dr. Blog to see what all the fuss is about. And she's got teenage daughters who I'm quite sure are aware of the existence of her website, and I'm sure she has personal friends who are more tech inclined, and also are aware she has a website. Any # of objective people would have mentioned what's up at this point. I would imagine any blogger whose only interest is maintaining a credible forum for their thought would have mentioned it to her by now. And seeing Maxpower's blog today, I don't think this is some freakish occurance. I think they just got caught red handed. Like the Cloony incident. I guess they learned from that incident that if you ignore it long enough, people forget.

6/26/2006  
Anonymous bebop said...

bronxzoo,
I know, but they weren't running this out of Arianna's basement off her SBC DSL line. They bought office space in Los Angeles and New York City. That alone is prohibitively expensive for most people. I'm sure the founders got private shares, but I'm also sure some or all of them actually had to dish out some dough to help launch the site. My point is, she never intended her site to be some information/opinion clearinghouse for the good of the people. It was meant to be a profitable business from the get go. You don't put in hundreds of thousands unless you're planning a return of millions.

Their success isn't some fluke. Look at the people involved.

http://www.ojr.org/ojr/stories/050503glaser/

6/26/2006  
Anonymous thebronxzoo said...

bebop

I don't disagree with you at all. Let me try to clarify again, for the extremely wealthy people involved the outlay was minimal. I think that what the lot of them is trying to protect is their stock options.

6/26/2006  
Anonymous Rosethejet said...

I understand that. I really do. I have been around a couple of very rich people and they are indeed very different from you and I.

I just keep hoping that she wakes up. She had a great site and if it is nothing more than all about the money, then she is a hack and nothing more.

Her daughters appear to be typical Beverly Hills girls by the way. So what they may or may not know is dependent upon just being good at the Crackberry. They aren't like John Kerry's daughters who are just amazing in their intelligence, ability, understanding and not bad on the eyes either.

So like I said, and I may be living in Oz, I just hope this is not the real her and that she has been bullshitted completley by the money and her techies.

I can hope, but I do understand the reality of a situation.

6/26/2006  
Blogger shooter said...

All she has to do is write the feature post on her site tomorrow. In it she says " I come before you guilty, exhausted, and ashamed. Let me tell you how this all came about. I want to tell you where I was personally, financially, and emotionally, Not to make excuses, but to try and explain. ........................................................................................................................................................(you fill it in)...
If you never click on my name on your computers again, I understand, but if you'll give me a second chance, I swear, you'll see the REAL Arianna Huffington.

Her following would triple overnite.

6/27/2006  
Blogger Roger Rancourt said...

Folks what is hard to understand?

Arianna Huffington is not coming "back", because the truth is she was never there.

This glorified image of "Arianna" you keep spouting everywhere is, a fantasal phantasm.

An elaborate illusion.

On TV it personafied this. She interrupted Rhandi Rhodes, over 50 times, when debating the war in Iraq too...

She is rude, glorified, rich, celebrity addict with quirky habits.

She is not some queen of the progressive universe!! Her image was, is distorted to make her seem "caring" or "kind".

In that she is very caring, of how much money and status everyone receives.

It is HER enterprise, and it is her family. That's how she is. None of this even bothers her.

She's an ex conservative, very close to the right, and left. She has always had aspirations and big money.

No, what's happened here is the facade has crumbled. And the "left" plus "right" have seen her exposed naked....

As the shrill, celebrity star status gossip guzzler she always was. Hate to break it to you, but that is her life, despire her desire to help the world.

She's simply laughing back at how long she suckered all of you, and waiting for the next windfall. It does not matter how many leave, since HuffPo has advertising that finally rivals Fox News even!

:-D

Welcome to the business world.

6/27/2006  
Blogger Michael Brereton said...

roger,

With plenty of evidence supporting you and no other evidence to the contrary, and against my hopes, I have to conclude that you are right.

I have now shifted to being upset with myself for being such a fool to think that a celebrity such as herself would actually put principles before fame and money (or actually have principles in the first place).

Shame on me. I guess we just have to hope Dr. Rost starts his own site. Any name suggestions? "TheRoster"? Sorry - way too lame.

6/27/2006  
Blogger Janine said...

I actually think she will make a "mea culpa" post if this flap starts affecting their bottom line. She made one after the Clooney fiasco, but only after several days of people beating her up for it. And when it came out it seemed to me it was a little too perfect... it didn't ring true for me, even though I was still a fan at that time.

It's taking longer to come this time because it's a much stickier situation; how can she apologize and take responsibilty (whether she means it or not) without firing someone she doesn't want to fire?

I don't think Arianna is a total phony; I've been listening to her over the last year on "Left, Right and Center" on KCRW and thought she had plenty of reasonable, intelligent things to say. I think over the last year she has had so many pepole fawning over her that she has begun to believe her own press, and that's never a good thing. She now thinks she can do no wrong, that all her decisions are right, because everyone around her is treating her that way.

I expect she will snap out of it eventually, but it may take a long while and a lot of trouble to get there.

6/27/2006  
Blogger beeta said...

WOW!
What an irony!
Wasn't the criticism of Doc for the most part that he was self promoting, egocentric, out to boost his own financial future?
And now everybody is reaching the conclusion that Arianna fits the profile much better than Doc.
What a hoot!

6/27/2006  
Blogger beeta said...

BTW Doc,
TNX for letting us hang out at your house!

6/27/2006  
Blogger Roger Rancourt said...

There's a big irony in that, for sure beeta!

I am sure there will be some "mea culpa", and then business as usual unless they stop doing business with JWT.

6/27/2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I got banned yet again for posting what I did on page 1 of the comments at the following blog entry (as censorship is still very much alive at Huffingtonpost.com):

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2006/06/27/al-qaeda-jihadi-textbook_n_23892.html

bannedagain10

6/28/2006  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home